27 C
Lagos
Thursday, February 12, 2026
Header1
Home Blog Page 141

Medical Doctors Draw Battle Line Over Proposed Five-Year Mandatory Practice Bill

0

Nigeria’s House of Representatives is in the spotlight for proposing a bill that would prevent medical doctors from seeking better job opportunities within five years of completing their medical education.

The bill was introduced in response to the alarming trend of brain drain in the country’s healthcare sector, with many healthcare professionals leaving Nigeria for other countries.

This crisis has left government officials scrambling for a solution, as the nation suffers from an acute shortage of doctors, with a doctor-patient ratio over five times lower than the World Health Organization’s recommendation. The problem has been particularly acute in the United Kingdom, which has seen an exodus of over 5,600 Nigerian medical doctors in the last eight years.

FILE PHOTO: Members of the House of Representatives during plenary

The Nigerian Medical Association has warned that the health sector is on the brink of collapse if urgent measures are not taken to address the issue of brain drain.

The association has called for an emergency solution, stating that Nigeria may need to recruit doctors from foreign countries in the future. Recently, the National President of the Medical and Dental Consultants of Nigeria revealed that over 500 medical consultants have left the country in the past two years.

READ ALSO: Police Officer Detained for Fatal Shooting of Delta Trader Claims Innocence: ‘It Was Not Intentional

“This figure is as of March last year; so it is far more than that,” Makanjuola said during a National Executive Committee meeting of the Association in Enugu.

He added that, “we are not where we are supposed to be; we are faced with poor budgetary allocation, poor infrastructure, lack of incentives leading to brain-drain, challenge of power generation and distribution in most of our facilities.

“It has become difficult for administrators to run the facilities smoothly and provide efficient medical care for the citizens.”

The Kaduna State Chapter of the Nigeria Medical Association (NMA) sounded the alarm in October of last year, urging authorities to take immediate action to curb the ongoing brain drain of medical personnel in the state.

The NMA noted that over the last seven years, no fewer than 10,000 doctors had left Nigeria in search of better opportunities, a worrisome trend.

Similarly, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, comprising the governors of all 36 states, expressed concern about the prevalence of brain drain in the health sector towards the end of last year. Sokoto State Governor and Forum Chairman Aminu Waziri Tambuwal highlighted these concerns during a visit to Dr Osagie Ehanire, the Minister of Health, in Abuja.

“We are witnessing brain drain over the years. It is alarming, and I believe it has something to do with the welfare of medical personnel.

“I urge the federal government to do something about this urgently,” Tambuwal said.

In March of this year, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified 55 countries, including Nigeria, as facing the most significant workforce challenges related to Universal Health Coverage. In response, the UK placed Nigeria and 53 other countries on its red list, advising health and social care employers not to actively target recruitment from these nations. Factors contributing to this problem include low salaries, poor working conditions, lack of career advancement opportunities, inadequate resources and infrastructure, political instability, and insecurity.

READ ALSO: Twelve-Year-Old Girl dies in Car Crash – Police

Concerned about the impending threat of brain drain in Nigeria’s healthcare sector, the House of Representatives proposed a bill to address the crisis.

Sponsored by Ganiyu Johnson, who represents Oshodi-Isolo Federal Constituency 2 of Lagos State in the House of Representatives, the bill aims to amend the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act to require Nigerian-trained medical or dental practitioners to work in the country for at least five years before being granted full licenses. However, the bill has encountered opposition from healthcare professionals.

According to Johnson, “It was only fair for medical practitioners, who enjoyed taxpayer subsidies on their training, to give back to society”.

Uzoma Nkem-Abonta, who represents Abia State on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), voiced opposition to the bill, arguing that it would restrict doctors in Nigeria for five years before they could pursue employment opportunities in foreign countries.

Similarly, Mark Gbillah, a lawmaker from Benue, opposed the bill, citing clauses that would infringe on the fundamental human rights of Nigerian-trained doctors.

“A person in such a critical field as medicine — how would you give somebody a temporary licence? You would need a licence to be certified to practice.

“Do we try to restrict these people and infringe on their fundamental human rights or apportion more resources to the medical profession?” Gbillah said.

The National Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) expressed its opposition to the bill, as stated in a communique issued at the end of the association’s extended National Officers’ Committee (NOC) meeting.

“The extended NOC observed with shock and disappointment the infuriating attempts by Honourable Ganiyu Abiodun Johnson and the Federal House of Representatives to enslave Nigerian-Trained Medical Doctors for five years post-graduation before they can be issued full practising licences or allowed to travel abroad if they so wished,” it said.

In an interview with DAILY POST, Dr Okwudili Obayi, a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, and a Public Relations Officer of the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, expressed his disappointment with the bill proposed by the National Assembly.

Dr Obayi believed that the bill infringes on the freedom of young health practitioners by denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years. He also argued that the bill would not alleviate the problem of brain drain but would instead exacerbate it.

He said, “It is a very unfortunate thing for anybody to think; very unfortunate in the sense that you are infringing on people’s human right to freedom.

“Even if the person was sponsored or trained free by the country, the country can not say don’t leave, unless there is a bond signed. Look at it; why select doctors? Every other person has the right to travel; why should it only be doctors that should not travel?

“Brain drain is in all aspects. In recent times, we have witnessed a wave of people leaving the health sector; doctors, nurses, pharmacists and all that; it is higher than what it used to be in the past. But then denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years is not the answer to it.”

According to the psychiatrist, “We know the main causes of brain drain; and that they are large. Supposing one wants to look at what makes people leave the health sector, one may say services, salary, rewards, poor working conditions, general insecurity ( doctors have been kidnapped more than any other profession in the country), unemployment of young doctors even in the state of this mass exodus and many others are responsible.”

READ ALSO: Peter Obi Reveals Intense Pressure to Flee Nigeria Amidst Political Turmoil

Obayi further advised the government to create an enabling environment and address the issue of insecurity head-on in order to curtail brain drain.

“Regarding the proposed bill, it is unfortunate that a normal human should think about it. It is an embarrassing bill, to say the least.

“If they would want to proffer a solution to brain drain in the health sector, they should look at the working condition, enabling environment, and take home an average worker. A doctor’s lifespan is known to be low compared to any other profession simply because of overworking.

“Burnout is high in the health profession, both among doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers. These are the major reasons people say, ‘we should leave to where our services are more appreciated and our reward better’.

“The impact is much when people leave; it is enormous. It is not good for any country that its young graduates are leaving en masse.

“The government should create an enabling environment and address the issue of insecurity head-on,” he said.

In an interview with DAILY POST, Dr Okwudili Obayi, a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, and a Public Relations Officer of the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, expressed his disappointment with the bill proposed by the National Assembly.

Dr Obayi believed that the bill infringes on the freedom of young health practitioners by denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years. He also argued that the bill would not alleviate the problem of brain drain but would instead exacerbate it.

“Well, I think in the first instance, the bill smarks ignorance on the person proposing the bill. I have tried to read the bill a bit, and it does not even look like somebody who understands the dynamics of the medical profession, training and practice.

“I give one example- in the entire world, there is no place where anybody has to wait for five years before he would be given a licence to practise medicine. It supposes that there would be a kind of five years of house-manship; it does not happen in any part of the world. The maximum anywhere anybody has done is a year.

“As a matter of fact, in some countries, when they have a crisis, even as recent as the Ebola crisis, people shorten such a period. In some places, medical students were not even examined; they were brought out to help in the workforce.

“What it means is that if you say somebody would stay five years before licensing the person, you are saying that the person cannot take responsibility for managing a patient. The brain he is trying to gain, he is not actually gaining it; he is losing it because you finish training the person for another five years – a post-training, yet he is not a doctor; he is a supervisee to be supervised.

“So he cannot take responsibility for a patient. So what kind of gain is it in a human being who is only existing in name and not in activity?

“The other aspect of it is that the labour law says you cannot force somebody to do a particular work or to work in a particular place or work under a particular circumstance. This is modern-day slavery. This is subjecting and forcing people to say, ‘You must work here’. This is actually usurping their rights as human beings to move.

“The mobility of labour is known all over the world; people can choose where they want to be.”

According to him, the proposed bill will compound brain drain more than it can solve the problem.

The health expert believed that the government should identify the causes before it could proffer a good solution to the crisis.

“What is even the status of these people vis-a-vis their salaries? They won’t have any status in Nigerian medical practice where we have levels of employment. What are you calling them? Even when someone is fully employed, promotion takes place every three years.

“So when are they going to be promoted? Are you going to promote them after three years or what? Because their careers don’t really start until they have a full licence. So these are the issues.

“Talking about the bursary, saying medical students are paid with taxpayers’ money; they get bursaries from the government. Is there anybody who attended a public university who got a different treatment vis-a-vis expenses from the rest?

“Engineers, lawyers, sociologists, teachers, all of us that went to Nigerian public universities, let’s assume there is a subsidy, everybody enjoyed that subsidy. How can you single out medical doctors to say, ‘Okay, you cannot move around; you cannot choose where to go because the government funded your education. Whose education was not funded by the government?

“This is the same National Assembly that has recently thrown away a bill trying to stop them from sending their children abroad for education. This is the same National Assembly that is refusing the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria to regulate the influx of foreign-trained doctors into this country. I mean Nigerians that trained abroad.

“Some people have gone to places where their medical education is sub-optimal. And the National Assembly refuses MDCN to re-examine these people before they can be licensed; they have refused it to happen. I cannot explain what they are thinking about healthcare delivery in our country. The reality of what they are proposing will compound brain drain more than it can solve it.

“The bill targets people who just graduated, but professors and consultants are leaving, and very senior medical doctors are leaving the country too.

“The bill did not even identify the causes of brain drain. Unless you identify the causes, you cannot proffer a good solution. And that is exactly what this bill has failed to do- to identify and properly diagnose the problem and proffer a very good solution,” he said.

Medical Doctors Draw Battle Line Over Proposed Five-Year Mandatory Practice Bill

Nigeria’s House of Representatives is in the spotlight for proposing a bill that would prevent medical doctors from seeking better job opportunities within five years of completing their medical education.

The bill was introduced in response to the alarming trend of brain drain in the country’s healthcare sector, with many healthcare professionals leaving Nigeria for other countries.

This crisis has left government officials scrambling for a solution, as the nation suffers from an acute shortage of doctors, with a doctor-patient ratio over five times lower than the World Health Organization’s recommendation. The problem has been particularly acute in the United Kingdom, which has seen an exodus of over 5,600 Nigerian medical doctors in the last eight years.

The Nigerian Medical Association has warned that the health sector is on the brink of collapse if urgent measures are not taken to address the issue of brain drain.

The association has called for an emergency solution, stating that Nigeria may need to recruit doctors from foreign countries in the future. Recently, the National President of the Medical and Dental Consultants of Nigeria revealed that over 500 medical consultants have left the country in the past two years.

“This figure is as of March last year; so it is far more than that,” Makanjuola said during a National Executive Committee meeting of the Association in Enugu.

He added that, “we are not where we are supposed to be; we are faced with poor budgetary allocation, poor infrastructure, lack of incentives leading to brain-drain, challenge of power generation and distribution in most of our facilities.

“It has become difficult for administrators to run the facilities smoothly and provide efficient medical care for the citizens.”

The Kaduna State Chapter of the Nigeria Medical Association (NMA) sounded the alarm in October of last year, urging authorities to take immediate action to curb the ongoing brain drain of medical personnel in the state.

The NMA noted that over the last seven years, no fewer than 10,000 doctors had left Nigeria in search of better opportunities, a worrisome trend.

Similarly, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, comprising the governors of all 36 states, expressed concern about the prevalence of brain drain in the health sector towards the end of last year. Sokoto State Governor and Forum Chairman Aminu Waziri Tambuwal highlighted these concerns during a visit to Dr Osagie Ehanire, the Minister of Health, in Abuja.

“We are witnessing brain drain over the years. It is alarming, and I believe it has something to do with the welfare of medical personnel.

“I urge the federal government to do something about this urgently,” Tambuwal said.

In March of this year, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified 55 countries, including Nigeria, as facing the most significant workforce challenges related to Universal Health Coverage. In response, the UK placed Nigeria and 53 other countries on its red list, advising health and social care employers not to actively target recruitment from these nations. Factors contributing to this problem include low salaries, poor working conditions, lack of career advancement opportunities, inadequate resources and infrastructure, political instability, and insecurity.

Concerned about the impending threat of brain drain in Nigeria’s healthcare sector, the House of Representatives proposed a bill to address the crisis.

Sponsored by Ganiyu Johnson, who represents Oshodi-Isolo Federal Constituency 2 of Lagos State in the House of Representatives, the bill aims to amend the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act to require Nigerian-trained medical or dental practitioners to work in the country for at least five years before being granted full licenses. However, the bill has encountered opposition from healthcare professionals.

READ ALSO: TikTok Pays Price for Breaking Age Limit: UK Imposes $15.9 Million Fine

According to Johnson, “It was only fair for medical practitioners, who enjoyed taxpayer subsidies on their training, to give back to society”.

Uzoma Nkem-Abonta, who represents Abia State on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), voiced opposition to the bill, arguing that it would restrict doctors in Nigeria for five years before they could pursue employment opportunities in foreign countries.

Similarly, Mark Gbillah, a lawmaker from Benue, opposed the bill, citing clauses that would infringe on the fundamental human rights of Nigerian-trained doctors.

“A person in such a critical field as medicine — how would you give somebody a temporary licence? You would need a licence to be certified to practice.

“Do we try to restrict these people and infringe on their fundamental human rights or apportion more resources to the medical profession?” Gbillah said.

The National Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) expressed its opposition to the bill, as stated in a communique issued at the end of the association’s extended National Officers’ Committee (NOC) meeting.

“The extended NOC observed with shock and disappointment the infuriating attempts by Honourable Ganiyu Abiodun Johnson and the Federal House of Representatives to enslave Nigerian-Trained Medical Doctors for five years post-graduation before they can be issued full practising licences or allowed to travel abroad if they so wished,” it said.

In an interview with DAILY POST, Dr Okwudili Obayi, a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, and a Public Relations Officer of the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, expressed his disappointment with the bill proposed by the National Assembly.

Dr Obayi believed that the bill infringes on the freedom of young health practitioners by denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years. He also argued that the bill would not alleviate the problem of brain drain but would instead exacerbate it.

He said, “It is a very unfortunate thing for anybody to think; very unfortunate in the sense that you are infringing on people’s human right to freedom.

“Even if the person was sponsored or trained free by the country, the country can not say don’t leave, unless there is a bond signed. Look at it; why select doctors? Every other person has the right to travel; why should it only be doctors that should not travel?

“Brain drain is in all aspects. In recent times, we have witnessed a wave of people leaving the health sector; doctors, nurses, pharmacists and all that; it is higher than what it used to be in the past. But then denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years is not the answer to it.”

According to the psychiatrist, “We know the main causes of brain drain; and that they are large. Supposing one wants to look at what makes people leave the health sector, one may say services, salary, rewards, poor working conditions, general insecurity ( doctors have been kidnapped more than any other profession in the country), unemployment of young doctors even in the state of this mass exodus and many others are responsible.”

Obayi further advised the government to create an enabling environment and address the issue of insecurity head-on in order to curtail brain drain.

“Regarding the proposed bill, it is unfortunate that a normal human should think about it. It is an embarrassing bill, to say the least.

“If they would want to proffer a solution to brain drain in the health sector, they should look at the working condition, enabling environment, and take home an average worker. A doctor’s lifespan is known to be low compared to any other profession simply because of overworking.

“Burnout is high in the health profession, both among doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers. These are the major reasons people say, ‘we should leave to where our services are more appreciated and our reward better’.

“The impact is much when people leave; it is enormous. It is not good for any country that its young graduates are leaving en masse.

“The government should create an enabling environment and address the issue of insecurity head-on,” he said.

In an interview with DAILY POST, Dr Okwudili Obayi, a Consultant Psychiatrist at the Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, and a Public Relations Officer of the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, expressed his disappointment with the bill proposed by the National Assembly.

Dr Obayi believed that the bill infringes on the freedom of young health practitioners by denying them a licence unless they practise for at least five years. He also argued that the bill would not alleviate the problem of brain drain but would instead exacerbate it.

“Well, I think in the first instance, the bill smarks ignorance on the person proposing the bill. I have tried to read the bill a bit, and it does not even look like somebody who understands the dynamics of the medical profession, training and practice.

“I give one example- in the entire world, there is no place where anybody has to wait for five years before he would be given a licence to practise medicine. It supposes that there would be a kind of five years of house-manship; it does not happen in any part of the world. The maximum anywhere anybody has done is a year.

“As a matter of fact, in some countries, when they have a crisis, even as recent as the Ebola crisis, people shorten such a period. In some places, medical students were not even examined; they were brought out to help in the workforce.

“What it means is that if you say somebody would stay five years before licensing the person, you are saying that the person cannot take responsibility for managing a patient. The brain he is trying to gain, he is not actually gaining it; he is losing it because you finish training the person for another five years – a post-training, yet he is not a doctor; he is a supervisee to be supervised.

“So he cannot take responsibility for a patient. So what kind of gain is it in a human being who is only existing in name and not in activity?

“The other aspect of it is that the labour law says you cannot force somebody to do a particular work or to work in a particular place or work under a particular circumstance. This is modern-day slavery. This is subjecting and forcing people to say, ‘You must work here’. This is actually usurping their rights as human beings to move.

“The mobility of labour is known all over the world; people can choose where they want to be.”

According to him, the proposed bill will compound brain drain more than it can solve the problem.

The health expert believed that the government should identify the causes before it could proffer a good solution to the crisis.

“What is even the status of these people vis-a-vis their salaries? They won’t have any status in Nigerian medical practice where we have levels of employment. What are you calling them? Even when someone is fully employed, promotion takes place every three years.

“So when are they going to be promoted? Are you going to promote them after three years or what? Because their careers don’t really start until they have a full licence. So these are the issues.

“Talking about the bursary, saying medical students are paid with taxpayers’ money; they get bursaries from the government. Is there anybody who attended a public university who got a different treatment vis-a-vis expenses from the rest?

READ ALSO: NCC Refutes Phone Tracking and Leakage Allegations in Obi/Oyedepo Call Controversy

“Engineers, lawyers, sociologists, teachers, all of us that went to Nigerian public universities, let’s assume there is a subsidy, everybody enjoyed that subsidy. How can you single out medical doctors to say, ‘Okay, you cannot move around; you cannot choose where to go because the government funded your education. Whose education was not funded by the government?

“This is the same National Assembly that has recently thrown away a bill trying to stop them from sending their children abroad for education. This is the same National Assembly that is refusing the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria to regulate the influx of foreign-trained doctors into this country. I mean Nigerians that trained abroad.

“Some people have gone to places where their medical education is sub-optimal. And the National Assembly refuses MDCN to re-examine these people before they can be licensed; they have refused it to happen. I cannot explain what they are thinking about healthcare delivery in our country. The reality of what they are proposing will compound brain drain more than it can solve it.

“The bill targets people who just graduated, but professors and consultants are leaving, and very senior medical doctors are leaving the country too.

“The bill did not even identify the causes of brain drain. Unless you identify the causes, you cannot proffer a good solution. And that is exactly what this bill has failed to do- to identify and properly diagnose the problem and proffer a very good solution,” he said.

 

Inline1

Police Officer Detained for Fatal Shooting of Delta Trader Claims Innocence: ‘It Was Not Intentional

0

A young trader, Onyeka Emmanuel Ibe, was reportedly shot dead at a checkpoint in Anwai-Ugbolu road, near Asaba, the capital of Delta State, by a policeman with the Delta State Police Command who was subsequently detained for alleged murder. The policeman has since recounted the incident, stating that it was not intentional, ‘Before I could drag it from him, my belt entered the trigger then it fired. It was not intentional or deliberate to kill him.’ This incident caused public unrest as angry youths blocked major roads in Asaba over the alleged extrajudicial killing by the police.

According to his colleagues, Ibe was on his way to work when he was stopped by policemen at a checkpoint along the Ugbolu-Asaba Highway. They allege that he refused to offer a N100 bribe which angered one of the policemen who shot him in the head, killing him on the spot.

READ ALSO: Twelve-Year-Old Girl dies in Car Crash – Police

The protesters took the protest to the police headquarters in Asaba where the state police commissioner was on hand to receive them, promising that investigations into the unfortunate incident are underway and the policeman involved is already in custody. The Commissioner of Police, Ari Ali, said, ‘I can assure you nobody can cover this. It is an ugly situation and we are not happy that it happened the way it happened.’

READ ALSO: Peter Obi Reveals Intense Pressure to Flee Nigeria Amidst Political Turmoil

Unsatisfied with the police response, the protesters left with the corpse of the victim to the Government House to seek the intervention of the state Governor, Ifeanyi Okowa for thorough investigation. Until his unfortunate death, Ibe traded in phones and phone accessories. His death has left his wife and other members of his family devastated.

Inline1

Frank Lampard Makes Shocking Comeback as Chelsea’s Interim Manager – Can He Lead the Blues to Glory Once Again?

0
Chelsea’s English head coach Frank Lampard (C) celebrates at the end of the game during the English Premier League football match between Chelsea and Leeds United at Stamford Bridge in London on December 5, 2020. Chelsea won the game 3-1. DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS / POOL / AFP

On Thursday, Frank Lampard made a stunning comeback to Chelsea as a caretaker manager until the end of the season, over two years after his dismissal from the Premier League team.

Lampard, who holds the record for the most goals scored by a Chelsea player, was previously the manager from July 2019 until January 2021, when he was replaced by Thomas Tuchel.

The 44-year-old’s unforeseen return to Stamford Bridge took place following the dismissal of Tuchel’s successor Graham Potter on Sunday, with the club situated in the bottom half of the Premier League standings.

READ ALSO: TikTok Pays Price for Breaking Age Limit: UK Imposes $15.9 Million Fine

“We are delighted to welcome Frank back to Stamford Bridge,” Chelsea co-controlling owners Todd Boehly and Behdad Eghbali said in a statement.

“Frank is a Premier League Hall of Famer and a legend at this club.

“As we continue our thorough and exhaustive process for a permanent head coach, we want to provide the club and our fans with a clear and stable plan for the remainder of the season.”

The statement said Lampard “has all of the characteristics and qualities we need to drive us to the finish line”.

After being sacked by relegation-threatened Everton in January, former England midfielder Frank Lampard had been jobless.

However, Lampard has made a return to the managerial position with Chelsea, who have nine league games left this season, commencing with their trip to Wolves on Saturday.

READ ALSO: Peter Obi Reveals Intense Pressure to Flee Nigeria Amidst Political Turmoil

This match will be followed by the first leg of their Champions League quarter-final against holders Real Madrid. Lampard observed from the stands on Tuesday as the Blues, under caretaker boss Bruno Saltor, began the post-Potter era with a goalless draw against Liverpool.

Despite spending over £500 million ($623 million) on new players this season, the west London club currently sit in 11th place in the table, 14 points behind the top four. Chelsea officials reportedly held talks with ex-Barcelona and Spain coach Luis Enrique, who flew into London on Wednesday, regarding the full-time job. Julian Nagelsmann, the recently sacked former Bayern Munich coach, is also believed to be a candidate.

During Lampard’s previous tenure as manager, he led Chelsea to the 2020 FA Cup final, which ended in a 2-1 defeat to Arsenal, after spending a single season in charge of second-tier Derby.

 

AFP

 

Inline1

TikTok Pays Price for Breaking Age Limit: UK Imposes $15.9 Million Fine

1

On Tuesday, the UK’s data regulator announced that it had imposed a fine of £12.7 million ($15.9 million) on TikTok for allowing approximately 1.4 million children under the age of 13 to use its social media platform in breach of its own policies.

The Information Commissioner’s Office stated that the Chinese-owned company had violated UK law by failing to obtain the consent of parents or guardians for the use of their children’s data, despite the fact that these users were too young to create accounts.

TikTok nevertheless welcomed a decision by the ICO to slash the fine from £27 million, which the regulator had previously warned it might impose.

READ ALSO: Peter Obi Reveals Intense Pressure to Flee Nigeria Amidst Political Turmoil

TikTok contested the ICO’s conclusion, which comes in addition to a series of prohibitions on the platform’s use by Western governments on official devices, citing concerns that Beijing may be able to access the data.

“We will continue to review the decision and are considering next steps,” the company said in a statement.

“We invest heavily to help keep under 13s off the platform and our 40,000-strong safety team works around the clock to help keep the platform safe for our community,” it said.

Despite this, TikTok expressed its appreciation for the ICO’s decision to reduce the fine from £27 million, which the regulator had earlier cautioned might be imposed.

Although TikTok’s terms of service prohibit the creation of accounts by children under the age of 13, the ICO stated that the company had not conducted sufficient checks to prevent such occurrences in the UK, resulting in up to 1.4 million children being impacted in 2020.

READ ALSO: Twelve-Year-Old Girl dies in Car Crash – Police

“That means that their data may have been used to track them and profile them, potentially delivering harmful, inappropriate content at their very next scroll,” Information Commissioner John Edwards said.

“There are laws in place to make sure our children are as safe in the digital world as they are in the physical world,” he said in a statement.

“TikTok did not abide by those laws.”

 

Inline1

Peter Obi Reveals Intense Pressure to Flee Nigeria Amidst Political Turmoil

0
File Photo: Labour Party Presidential Candidate, Peter Obi

On Wednesday night, Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s presidential candidate, claimed that he is facing pressure to leave Nigeria.

In a statement, Obi accused the All Progressives Congress (APC) and various government agencies of attempting to divert attention from the shortcomings in this year’s elections by attacking his character.

READ ALSO: NCC Refutes Phone Tracking and Leakage Allegations in Obi/Oyedepo Call Controversy

The former governor of Anambra State also addressed the issue of a viral audio recording that purportedly featured him speaking with Bishop David Oyedepo of Winners Chapel, urging the religious leader to support his presidential aspirations in order to secure victory for Christians in Nigeria’s “religious war.”

Obi dismissed the alleged audio as fraudulent.

“The present attempts by the APC as a Party, and the APC Led-government through some government officials and agencies to divert our attention from our blatantly stolen mandate is unfortunate and sad,” Obi said.

“These have come and continued to manifest in different ways, such as the malicious accusation of the Minister of Information, Mr Lai Mohammed, the circulation of a fake doctored audio call, and a pressure on me to leave the country.

“Let me reiterate that the audio call being circulated is fake, and at no time throughout the campaign and now did I ever say, think, or even imply that the 2023 election is, or was a religious war.”

READ ALSO: Monetary tightening and increasing risks cause Nigeria’s capital inflow to falter

He appealed to Nigerians and the international community to intervene and pressure the APC to halt their assaults.

Furthermore, he emphasized his dedication and determination to lawfully and peacefully reclaim the people’s mandate.

Inline1

Monetary tightening and increasing risks cause Nigeria’s capital inflow to falter

0
[FILES PHOTO] Bureau de change. PHOTO: QZ

The investment market in the country is feeling the effects of aggressive global monetary tightening and rising political and business risks, with capital importation dropping by 20% last year according to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). This is according to a report by The Guardian, which further describes the situation as a significant decrease from $6.7 billion in 2021 to $5.33 billion in 2022, just ahead of the country’s general election. The impact of the election on the capital inflow, which is a measure of market attractiveness, was particularly felt in Q4, with a 51.51% decrease in year-on-year changes compared to Q4 2021. In addition, the recent fall in capital importation has been attributed to increasing business risk, insecurity, political risk, foreign exchange market rigidity, and the high arbitrage between official and black markets.

READ ALSO: Twelve-Year-Old Girl dies in Car Crash – Police

On a state-by-state analysis, Lagos accounted for the majority of the inflow at 68% or $3.61 billion, while the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) recorded $1.63 billion or 31%. Interestingly, 27 states, including Abia, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Benue, Borno, Cross Rivers, and Delta, did not receive any inflow, and Ogun and Rivers had zero capital importation for the entire year. Production, banking, and telecommunications received the bulk of the capital, accounting for 37.01%, 24.08%, and 15.86%, respectively. Share and trading received over 5% each, while oil and gas, which used to be a major foreign investment attraction, received only 0.21% of the total inflow.

According to economist Eze Onyekpere, the uncertainty surrounding the 2023 elections and the likely policy direction of the new administration were key factors contributing to the poor performance of capital inflow. Onyekpere, who is the Lead Director of the Centre for Social Justice, explained that the fall was a result of investors adopting a wait-and-see approach in the lead-up to the first-quarter general elections.

READ ALSO: NCC Refutes Phone Tracking and Leakage Allegations in Obi/Oyedepo Call Controversy

“Many investors and stakeholders wanted to see the outcome of the elections, the new policy framework and whether there would be peace in the country before committing in terms of investment,” he said.

According to him, if the new administration follows a policy direction that investors view as favourable and provides a positive economic outlook, there is a high possibility of a rebound.

Inline1

Twelve-Year-Old Girl dies in Car Crash – Police

2
Benjamin Hundeyin, spokesman Lagos State police spokesman

On Wednesday, the Lagos State Police Command spokesperson, SP Benjamin Hundeyin, confirmed that a 12-year-old girl named Kope Mary had been hit by a vehicle.

The driver of the Toyota Camry car with registration number BDG 839 FS, identified as Kunle Ogungbeje, claimed to have lost control of the car. The incident occurred on Monday at around 6:40 p.m. at Olubunmi Junction by Mashalashi Street in the Iwaya Area.

READ ALSO: NCC Refutes Phone Tracking and Leakage Allegations in Obi/Oyedepo Call Controversy

The victim sustained a head injury and died while being transported to the hospital. Traffic police officers took photographs of the scene, and the victim’s body was deposited at Mainland General Hospital Mortuary, Yaba, for autopsy.

The vehicle involved in the accident has been moved to the Office of the Vehicle Inspection Officer (V.I.O) for inspection. The police investigation is ongoing.

READ ALSO: 2023 Polls: Accusations of Treason Fly Between FG and Obi

 

Inline1

NCC Refutes Phone Tracking and Leakage Allegations in Obi/Oyedepo Call Controversy

1
Headquarters of the Nigeria Communciations Commission (NCC) in Abuja
  • Timi Frank criticizes DSS as Buhari seeks Senate’s approval for Data Protection Bill.

The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) refutes claims of telephone tracking and leakage made against it in the media.

According to Reuben Muoka, NCC’s Director of Public Affairs, the commission has been receiving numerous inquiries from the media regarding allegations of telephone tracking and leakage made by some individuals and groups on social and traditional media.

NCC denies these allegations completely and states that it is not authorized under the Nigerian Communication Act (NCA) 2003 and other relevant laws to track or leak telephone conversations of anyone. The commission further states that it has reported these serious allegations to appropriate security agencies for investigation and necessary action.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the commission denies these allegations and advises the public to disregard them,” it added.

READ ALSO: 2023 Polls: Accusations of Treason Fly Between FG and Obi

Timi Frank, a former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has criticized the leakage of a conversation between the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) and Bishop David Oyedepo of the Living Faith Church Worldwide.

Frank, who is from Bayelsa, released a statement yesterday in which he called the act highly unprofessional and partisan, allegedly perpetrated by the Department of State Services (DSS).

He suggested that the DSS has become an intelligence arm of the APC and urged a complete overhaul of the security organization. Frank also urged the DSS to restore the lost confidence of Nigerians in its leadership by taking action.

He said: “It is worrisome when the most sophisticated security agency in the country descends into the arena of politics to favour the ruling party.”

President Muhammadu Buhari has written to the President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, requesting that the Nigerian Data Protection Bill be considered and approved by the Senate. The President’s letter, which was read on the floor of the red chamber, cites Section 58 (2) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. The Nigerian Data Protection Bill aims to provide a legal framework for the safeguarding of personal information and the creation of the Nigerian Data Protection Commission, which will regulate laws concerning personal information.

READ ALSO: Afenifere, Ohanaeze and Arewa Youths Unite Against Interim Government Scheme

In addition to this, the President has also written separate letters to the Senate requesting the approval of Abdul Abubakar’s re-appointment as a Non-Executive Director of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for a second and final term, and the establishment of the Nigeria Police Force College Training School and Institution.

Furthermore, President Buhari has sought the Senate’s approval for the reimbursement of Plateau and Borno states, in the amounts of N6.6 billion and N3.8 billion, respectively, for road projects executed on behalf of the Federal Government. The reimbursement is to be made through the issuance of promissory notes.

 

Inline1

2023 Polls: Accusations of Treason Fly Between FG and Obi

0
A photo collage of Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party and Lai Mohammed, Minister of Information and National Orientation

After being embroiled in a controversy over a leaked conversation with Dr. David Oyedepo, Founder and Presiding Bishop of Living Faith Church Worldwide, presidential candidate of Labour Party (LP), Peter Obi, found himself under scrutiny again when the Federal Government accused him of treason. This accusation came weeks after the ruling party’s candidate, Bola Tinubu, won the presidential election.

The Minister of Information, Lai Mohammed, spoke to journalists in Washington D.C. about the government’s position on the matter. Mohammed accused Obi of inciting violence over the election outcome, which he deemed to be a treasonable offense. Obi, who finished third in the election, along with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Atiku Abubakar, who finished second, is currently challenging the results in court.

While both Obi and Atiku have urged their supporters to avoid violence, Mohammed believes that seeking redress in court and inciting violence is unacceptable. Mohammed is currently engaging with international media organizations and think-tanks about the 2023 polls. He has already spoken to the Washington Post, Voice of America, Associated Press, and Foreign Policy Magazine. “Obi and his running mate, Yusuf Datti-Ahmed, cannot be threatening Nigerians that if the President-elect, Tinubu, is sworn in on May 29, it will be the end of democracy in Nigeria.

READ ALSO: Afenifere, Ohanaeze and Arewa Youths Unite Against Interim Government Scheme

“This is treason. You cannot be inviting insurrection, and this is what they are doing. Obi’s statement is that of a desperate person, he is not a democrat that he claimed to be. A democrat should not believe in democracy only when he wins election,” he said.

According to him, neither Obi nor Atiku have a pathway to victory in challenging the election results because they did not meet the constitutional requirements necessary to be declared president.

“The Constitution has stringent criteria for anybody who wants to be president of the country. Not only must he have the plurality of votes cast in an election, he must also have scored one-quarter of votes cast in at least 25 states.

“Only the President-elect met the criteria by scoring 8.79 million votes and having one-quarter of all the votes cast in 29 states of the federation. Atiku came second with 6.9 million votes, but was only able to make one-quarter of the votes cast in 21 states, while Obi came third with 5.8 million votes, but won only one-quarter of the votes cast in 15 states.

“You cannot win an election in a poll where you came a distant third position and failed to meet constitutional requirements. Obi, while complaining of fraud, has not disowned his victory in Lagos,” he said.

Mohammed explained that his purpose for being in the U.S. was to counteract the negative narratives that were being spread by the opposition and naysayers about the election.

He revealed that the opposition, who lost in the election, was making allegations of fraud and demanding the election be cancelled and an interim government be formed.

In response to this, Obi stated: “I have never discussed or encouraged anyone to undermine the Nigerian state; I have never sponsored or preached any action against the Nigerian state. Those initiating these actions have increasingly used their official positions and agents to make false allegations against me.

“I am on record as always, advocating peace and issue-based campaign and never campaigned based on ethnicity or religion. I am committed to due process, and presently seeking redress in the court.

“I urge those engaged in this de-marketing process to stop presenting Nigeria in such bad light. Our future generations deserve a new Nigeria, where they can live a secure and decent life like their counterparts in other climes. It is possible.”

Additionally, he stated that the current strategy of demarketing and slanderous campaigns against him by certain government and political party representatives would negatively portray Nigeria to the world.

He said: “It is most unfortunate that these consistent efforts to portray me quite contrary to what I am and my core values, is coming from such high quarters. Minister Lai accusing me of stoking insurrection is malicious and fictitious.”

Furthermore, the National Chairman of LP, Comrade Julius Abure, criticized the Minister of Information and advised him to refrain from misinforming the international community about the political situation in Nigeria. He suggested that Mohammed should instead reprimand the spokespersons of the ruling party.

READ ALSO: Soyinka Advocates Southeast Presidency for Civil War Healing

“Our presidential candidate is a peaceful and law-abiding person. Despite the fact that the election was provocatively rigged, he decided to be peaceful and toe the part of justice. In spite of all pressures from our supporters to move into the street to protest the outcome of the general election and to reclaim the mandate freely given to our candidate by the people, he has decided to calm the nerves in other to give the judicial process a chance.

“The presidential candidate of LP is the only candidate whose campaign  was issue-based. In spite of all provocation, it was LP and its candidates that were attacked in Lagos, Rivers and other states, but we have continued to promote peace. Therefore, for the Minister of Information to be admonishing our presidential candidate, was done in bad fate.”

The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), a civil rights advocacy group, expressed disagreement with Mohammed’s warning that Obi would be committing treason if he continues to challenge the supposed victory of President-elect Tinubu.

In a statement by its National Coordinator, Emmanuel Onwubiko, the group stated that such a warning is unfounded since a President-elect does not hold any constitutional powers, authority, or duties on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“Chapter 4 of the Constitution guarantees every citizen of Nigeria, including Obi, the fundamental freedoms, including freedom to associate with everyone and to exercise his freedom of speech.

“We are urging Mohammed to stop overheating the polity because there is no law that says persons who feel cheated in an election should sit indoors.

“President-elect is simply someone on rehearsal and hasn’t yet been conferred with any legal powers exercisable by a sitting President. And even a citizen President can be thoroughly criticised by the people of Nigeria, who owns the sovereignty of Nigeria,” HURIWA said.

 

Inline1

Afenifere, Ohanaeze and Arewa Youths Unite Against Interim Government Scheme

1
Arewa Youths

In a week that has been described as a dust storm, leading groups from the three major geopolitical zones in Nigeria have issued strong statements condemning an interim government, which has crept into national discourse, a report by The Guardian stated. The Yoruba, Igbo, and Hausa groups all joined voices in condemnation of the plot, which was uncovered by the Department of State Services (DSS) last Wednesday.

According to the DSS, some key players are plotting to install an interim government and prevent President-elect Asiwaju Bola Tinubu from being inaugurated as president. The Afenifere, a Yoruba socio-political organization, has warned against any action that could jeopardize the handing over of power to elected officers on May 29.

Mr. Jare Ajayi, the embattled National Publicity Secretary of Afenifere, issued a statement yesterday, purportedly on behalf of the group. In the statement, he expressed concern about the steps being taken that could be prejudicial to the swearing-in of the winners of the just concluded general elections.

Ajayi highlighted attempts to rubbish the outcome of the elections, especially the presidential election that held on February 25, as well as the resuscitation of calls for the formation of an interim government. He also noted protests or rallies being conducted, especially in Abuja and America, against the result of the said election.

Afenifere is worried about the untoward development because of how it is gaining currency in the country and even outside the shores of the land. Ajayi reminded those fanning the embers of non-inauguration of elected officers to be aware that the monster being courted would affect not only the presidency to be headed by the winner of the election, Tinubu.

READ ALSO: Pro-democracy Group Protests Against Opposition’s Plot to Undermine Nigerian Democracy

“The disruption will affect all other tiers of government as well as governors at the state level, lawmakers at the national and state levels, and perhaps, the local councils.

“There is, therefore, the need to exercise a lot of caution. The laws of the land created avenues to seek redress when we are aggrieved. We enjoin those who may not be satisfied with the outcome of the concluded elections to seek redress through the established channels and not through any other means. It is also important to let members of the public realise that anything short of following due process, particularly, in the swearing-in of winners of the just concluded elections, constitutes grave dangers for the country. This must not be accepted or encouraged at all because of its dire consequences,” the group said.

Ajayi, in addition, urged the judiciary not to entertain any cases that may be brought to derail the hard-earned civil rule, and consequently, scuttle Nigeria’s democracy. However, when asked to clarify the statement, the leader of Afenifere, Pa Ayo Adebanjo, said that Ajayi has no authority to issue statements on behalf of the organization, as he had been suspended, as announced in a previous communiqué.

Adebanjo went on to urge the public, particularly the media, to disregard any statements made by Ajayi on behalf of the group. Similarly, the Chidi Ibeh-led faction of Ohanaeze Ndigbo released a statement yesterday, asserting that the Ndigbo will not participate in any conspiracy to install an interim government. Instead, they are making arrangements to attend the inauguration of Tinubu on May 29.

In a statement released in Abakaliki, the Secretary-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Mazi Okechukwu Isiguzoro, challenged the DSS to arrest those behind the interim government scheme and ensure that they are brought to justice “those unpatriotic elements of destruction did not derail our democracy,” adding that their evil intent to forestall the smooth transition of power have hit the rock.

He emphasized that the Ndigbo not only denounce the demand for an interim government but also demands that the President-elect be inaugurated by May 29th. He also pointed out that the Ndigbo have been a marginalized group in Nigeria and have been endangered and “never again will Igbos be used as sacrificial lambs as we were used in 1993 during the Abiola saga, where a lot of Igbos were bullied, maimed, killed and their property looted.”

According to the statement: “Ndigbo will never recognise any interim government or be part of the evil scheme, as the clamour for an interim government is unconstitutional, satanic and atrocious, and those behind the call are only trying to plunge the country into avoidable political crises and make the Igbos scapegoats as Nigerians witnessed in 1993.

“The proponents of an interim government are already setting the stage through systematic burning of Igbo populated markets in Lagos (President-elect’s state) and Borno (Vice President-elect’s state) and promotion of hate campaigns against the Igbo. These are castles built on quicksand.

READ ALSO: Editorial: Strengthening Inspection of Election Materials to Deepen Poll Credibility

“Igbos are wiser and sophisticated now and we will continue to support the President-elect and ask him to commence the healing process tour from the Southeast by releasing IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu and incorporate the Southeast into the Government of National President (GNU) by giving the President of the Senate to the people of the region.

“Ndigbo will participate fully in all pre-inauguration and swearing-in ceremonies of the President-elect on May 29 and caution all of those who are working behind the scenes for the enthronement of an illegitimate interim government to use the courts to vent their resentments and grievances.

“We are satisfied that Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi have explored the legal options to recover their mandates and challenging the outcomes of presidential election in court is better than restraining a smooth transition of power. We will not allow unpatriotic monsters to truncate our hard-earned democracy,” the group said.

A Northern group, Arewa Youth Assembly (AYA), has voiced its strong opposition to the suggestion of an interim government in Nigeria. On Monday, the group issued a statement through its Speaker, Mohammed Salihu Danlami, stating that such calls were not in the country’s best interests and could result in increased instability and political uncertainty.

The group maintained that there was no need for such calls as the recently held elections were fair and credible.

To him, “as a youth organisation committed to the unity and progress of Nigeria, we are deeply concerned about the recent calls for an interim government to take over from the current administration. We believe that such a move would be unconstitutional and could set a dangerous precedent for our democracy.

“We are of the view that since the general elections were largely fair and credible due to the introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and winners have emerged, there is nothing that should warrant calls for the formation of an Interim National Government (ING).

“We believe that supporting the transition programme of the present government while taking advantage of the courts to seek redress is the best way to ensure political stability and continuity in Nigeria.

“We also urge all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and work towards finding solutions to the challenges facing our nation because it is only by working together that we can build a strong, united, and prosperous Nigeria for all.

“AYA strongly opposes any move to enforce an interim government in Nigeria. We call on all Nigerians to support the current administration and Tinubu, and work towards a better future for our nation,” he said.

In related news, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba, a former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), has proposed that the speedy handling of presidential election petitions is a crucial strategy against the possibility of an interim government.

In a statement issued on Thursday, Agbakoba urged all Nigerians to reject any secret plans that might be in place to derail the country’s democratic system. In a subsequent statement on Friday, the senior advocate suggested that an interim government would be unnecessary if the petitions are heard and resolved before May 29th.

“The tension around the call for an interim government is that the presidential election petition may not conclude before the inauguration of a new president on May 29, but it’s very possible to conclude these petitions, provided the court systems are very proactive.

“Under arbitration matters, procedural orders and or directions issue peremptorily to resolve sometimes very complex jurisdictional and procedural issues. The presidential election tribunals are urged to adapt the procedures very familiar with speedy conclusion of arbitration matters.”

Agbakoba identified three critical issues in the presidential election petitions that, he believes, can be resolved through the implementation of procedural orders and directions.

READ ALSO: Soyinka Advocates Southeast Presidency for Civil War Healing

“The first is the interpretation of Section 134 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria as to whether securing 25 per cent of votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, is compulsory to be a president.

“Secondly, is a candidate permitted to stand for presidential or vice presidential election when he is at the same time a senatorial candidate?

“The third point is the issue relating to the qualification of candidates to stand for presidential election.

“If the petitions were arbitration proceedings, an arbitrator may issue a procedural order directed to counsel to address all complex disputes and the arbitral tribunal will deliver what is called a partial final award,” Agbakoba said.

“In the case of the presidential election tribunal, including the Supreme Court, they can also direct procedural orders with very short timelines given to counsel, to address the complex jurisdictional issues raised in the petitions and the tribunal/supreme court will then issue final summary judgment as appropriate.

“We strongly believe that between the tribunal and Supreme Court, the petitions can be resolved within seven days from today. This will cool the temperature in Nigeria on the issue of interim government etc.

“The speed proposed here requires a radical departure from our present judicial policy where case management plays a very limited role in judicial outcomes. Case management is the spirit and driving force of modern adjudication. Speed of justice is the mantra that our judiciary must proclaim very loudly. This is needed in the presidential petition proceedings urgently,” he said in the statement.

The time limit prescribed by law for the hearing and delivery of judgment on an election petition is 180 days from the date of filing the petition. Similarly, an appeal arising from the decision of an election tribunal or court must be heard and concluded within 60 days from the date of the tribunal’s judgment.

Source: The Guardian

Inline1